HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026
Topstep vs The 5%ers
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | Topstep ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2012 | The 5%ers ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 69/100BETTER | 67/100 |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 90% | 100%BETTER |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 7dBETTER | 14d |
| PASS RATE | 28%BETTER | 18% |
| MIN COST | $49 | $39BETTER |
| MAX FUNDING | $150,000 | $4,000,000BETTER |
| RATING | 3/5 | 4.14/5BETTER |
| REVIEW COUNT | 3 | 5BETTER |
| STEPS | 1-step | 2-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Trailing EOD | Trailing |
TOPSTEP DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- futures, beginner
THE 5%ERS DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Metals, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, large-cap, advanced
Topstep PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
- +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
- +Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.
Topstep CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
- −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.
The 5%ers PROS
- +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
- +Max funding of $4,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272, offering exceptional capital scale
- +Min challenge cost of $39 is well below the industry average of $186.70, minimising entry costs
- +Profit target of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to pass
The 5%ers CONS
- −Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Pass rate of 18% is very low, indicating the majority of traders fail the evaluation
- −Trailing drawdown type is the most restrictive, shrinking the drawdown buffer as profits grow
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy
