Monevis vs Topstep

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

MONEVIS DETAILS

+Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a slightly better earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, supporting diverse trading approaches.
+On-demand payouts provide traders with maximum flexibility in withdrawing earned profits.

−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting overall earning potential.
−Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
−Founded in 2023, Monevis has a limited track record, which may concern traders prioritising firm stability.

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
+Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
+Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.

−Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
−Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
−Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.

Monevis

Lower trust score (58/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

Topstep

Higher trust score (69/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.