FundingPips vs Walkthrough Test Firm (TEST)

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC	FundingPips ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022	WALKTHRU Walkthrough Test Firm (TEST)
TRUST SCORE	—	54/100
PROFIT SPLIT	80%BETTER	75%
PAYOUT DAYS	0dBETTER	10d
MIN COST	$32BETTER	$99
MAX FUNDING	$100,000	$200,000BETTER
RATING	—	4.5/5
REVIEW COUNT	0	2BETTER
STEPS	2-step	2-step
DRAWDOWN	Static/Balance-based	Static

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

+Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
−Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

FundingPips

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.

Walkthrough Test Firm (TEST)

Trust score 54/100. Slower payouts at 10d. 75% profit split.