FundingPips vs Smart Prop Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

+Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
−Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

+Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Minimum challenge cost of $97 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+On-demand payouts, weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.
+Supports multiple platforms including MT4 and MT5.

−Max funding of $800,000 is slightly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Days to first payout of 7 is marginally above the industry average of 6.5 days.
−No fee refund offered, adding cost risk for traders who do not pass the challenge.

FundingPips

Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.

Smart Prop Trader

Lower trust score (55/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.