PropDNA
Search firms, traders…⌘K
Sign inTake the DNA Test →
Compare/FundingPips vs NK Securities
HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026

FundingPips vs NK Securities

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
NKSC
NK Securities
TRUST SCORE78/100BETTER51/100
PROFIT SPLIT80%—
PAYOUT DAYS2d—
PASS RATE——
MIN COST$29—
MAX FUNDING$2,000,000—
RATING0/54.36/5BETTER
REVIEW COUNT05BETTER
STEPS2-step—
DRAWDOWNFixed—

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

NK SECURITIES DETAILS

FundingPips PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
  • −Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
  • −No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

NK Securities PROS

  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate

NK Securities CONS

  • −No trading metrics were provided, preventing any comparison to industry averages
  • −India-based prop firms may face additional regulatory uncertainty for international traders
  • −Absence of data on profit split, funding, or payouts limits trader confidence

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundingPips
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.
NK Securities
Lower trust score (51/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FundingPips Full Review →NK Securities Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy