PropDNA
Search firms, traders…⌘K
Compare/FundingPips vs Goat Funded
HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026

FundingPips vs Goat Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
GOAT
Goat Funded
EST. 2023
TRUST SCORE78/100BETTER62/100
PROFIT SPLIT80%TIE80%TIE
PAYOUT DAYS2dTIE2dTIE
PASS RATE
MIN COST$29BETTER$49
MAX FUNDING$2,000,000BETTER$400,000
RATING0/53.43/5BETTER
REVIEW COUNT03BETTER
STEPS2-step2-step
DRAWDOWNFixedFixed

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

GOAT FUNDED DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
TradeLocker, MT5

FundingPips PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
  • No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

Goat Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

Goat Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, though it also provides more buffer.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundingPips
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.
Goat Funded
Lower trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FundingPips Full Review →Goat Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy