PropDNA
Search firms, traders…⌘K
Compare/FundingPips vs The 5%ers
HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026

FundingPips vs The 5%ers

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
5PRS
The 5%ers
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2016
TRUST SCORE78/100BETTER67/100
PROFIT SPLIT80%100%BETTER
PAYOUT DAYS2dBETTER14d
PASS RATE18%
MIN COST$29BETTER$39
MAX FUNDING$2,000,000$4,000,000BETTER
RATING0/54.14/5BETTER
REVIEW COUNT05BETTER
STEPS2-step2-step
DRAWDOWNFixedTrailing

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

THE 5%ERS DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Indices
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, large-cap, advanced

FundingPips PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
  • No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

The 5%ers PROS

  • +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Max funding of $4,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272, offering exceptional capital scale
  • +Min challenge cost of $39 is well below the industry average of $186.70, minimising entry costs
  • +Profit target of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to pass

The 5%ers CONS

  • Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
  • Pass rate of 18% is very low, indicating the majority of traders fail the evaluation
  • Trailing drawdown type is the most restrictive, shrinking the drawdown buffer as profits grow

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundingPips
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.
The 5%ers
Lower trust score (67/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 100% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FundingPips Full Review →The 5%ers Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy