FundedNext vs Smart Prop Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FUNDEDNEXT DETAILS

+Profit split of 95% is well above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 4 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is offered, and weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

−Overall drawdown of 10% with a relative drawdown type is above the industry average of 7.9% and more restrictive in practice.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass.
−Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

+Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Minimum challenge cost of $97 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+On-demand payouts, weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.
+Supports multiple platforms including MT4 and MT5.

−Max funding of $800,000 is slightly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Days to first payout of 7 is marginally above the industry average of 6.5 days.
−No fee refund offered, adding cost risk for traders who do not pass the challenge.

FundedNext

Higher trust score (67/100). Faster payouts at 4d. 95% profit split.

Smart Prop Trader

Lower trust score (55/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.