FundedNext vs Maven Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FUNDEDNEXT DETAILS

+Profit split of 95% is well above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 4 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is offered, and weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

−Overall drawdown of 10% with a relative drawdown type is above the industry average of 7.9% and more restrictive in practice.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass.
−Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

+Max funding of $1,000,000 significantly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Minimum challenge cost of $13 is far below the industry average of $186.7.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than fixed payout schedules.

−EA/automated trading is not allowed, excluding a large segment of systematic traders.
−Days to first payout at 10 days is above the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.

FundedNext

Lower trust score (67/100). Faster payouts at 4d. 95% profit split.

Maven Trading

Higher trust score (68/100). Slower payouts at 10d. 80% profit split.