FundedNext vs Lionheart Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FUNDEDNEXT DETAILS

+Profit split of 95% is well above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 4 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is offered, and weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

−Overall drawdown of 10% with a relative drawdown type is above the industry average of 7.9% and more restrictive in practice.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass.
−Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.

−Almost no firm data is provided, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
−Without cost, payout, or funding data, traders cannot assess value against the $186.7 average challenge cost.
−Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant concern for traders making real financial decisions.

FundedNext

Higher trust score (67/100). Faster payouts at 4d. 95% profit split.

Lionheart Funding

Lower trust score (41/100). Slower payouts at —d.