PropDNA
Search firms, traders…⌘K
Compare/E8 Funding vs FundingPips
HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026

E8 Funding vs FundingPips

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
E8FD
E8 Funding
EST. 2021
FPIP
FundingPips
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
TRUST SCORE60/10078/100BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT80%TIE80%TIE
PAYOUT DAYS3d2dBETTER
PASS RATE
MIN COST$25BETTER$29
MAX FUNDING$400,000$2,000,000BETTER
RATING3/5BETTER0/5
REVIEW COUNT2BETTER0
STEPS1-step2-step
DRAWDOWNFixed

E8 FUNDING DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Futures, Crypto

FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

E8 Funding PROS

  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $25 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed or bi-weekly schedules.

E8 Funding CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 3% is significantly below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving very little room for loss.
  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.

FundingPips PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.

FundingPips CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
  • No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.

PROPDNA VERDICT

E8 Funding
Lower trust score (60/100). Slower payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.
FundingPips
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

E8 Funding Full Review →FundingPips Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy