HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026
The 5%ers vs FundingPips
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | The 5%ers ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2016 | FundingPips ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 67/100 | 78/100BETTER |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 100%BETTER | 80% |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 14d | 2dBETTER |
| PASS RATE | 18% | — |
| MIN COST | $39 | $29BETTER |
| MAX FUNDING | $4,000,000BETTER | $2,000,000 |
| RATING | 4.14/5BETTER | 0/5 |
| REVIEW COUNT | 5BETTER | 0 |
| STEPS | 2-step | 2-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Trailing | Fixed |
THE 5%ERS DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Metals, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, large-cap, advanced
FUNDINGPIPS DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Indices, Metals, Energies
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
The 5%ers PROS
- +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
- +Max funding of $4,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272, offering exceptional capital scale
- +Min challenge cost of $39 is well below the industry average of $186.70, minimising entry costs
- +Profit target of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to pass
The 5%ers CONS
- −Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Pass rate of 18% is very low, indicating the majority of traders fail the evaluation
- −Trailing drawdown type is the most restrictive, shrinking the drawdown buffer as profits grow
FundingPips PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering broad trading flexibility.
FundingPips CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller earnings share.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to absorb larger losses.
- −No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost upon passing.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy
